1. Email over a couple of times that work for you to:
jason@labviewcoach.com
2. I'll echo back with a meeting link.
I look forward to connecting with you soon!
Jason Benfer
Your LabVIEW Coach


In a world where new programming languages and frameworks seem to pop up every week, you might wonder: Is LabVIEW still relevant? If you're an engineer, team lead, or test architect asking that question, the answer might surprise you.
LabVIEW, short for Laboratory Virtual Instrument Engineering Workbench, is a graphical programming language developed by National Instruments (now NI). And while it may not be the trendiest tool in software circles, it remains a mission-critical platform for test, measurement, and automation → especially in hardware-heavy industries like aerospace, automotive, energy, and medical devices.
If you're looking for a more technical breakdown of where LabVIEW shines (and where it doesn’t), take a look at our LabVIEW Software Overview.
LabVIEW’s real strength lies in its dataflow-based, parallel architecture. That’s not just a nice feature → it’s a game-changer for teams building and supporting complex test systems.
LabVIEW makes it almost trivial to run multiple processes in parallel → perfect for:
If your test system needs to acquire sensor data while updating a user interface, logging results, and talking to a PLC → all at the same time → LabVIEW makes that achievable without messy thread management.
Need a front panel to visualize readings, toggle controls, or initiate scripts? LabVIEW’s drag-and-drop environment makes it easy to:
If interface responsiveness is a priority, here's why LabVIEW is still the best tool for building test system UIs.
Engineers can go from concept to working interface without needing to learn frontend frameworks or UI libraries.
Unlike scripting languages, LabVIEW compiles your code into executables or real-time images. This:
No tool is perfect, and LabVIEW has its limitations → especially when it comes to:
if/else) can become bulky in LabVIEW.Some teams have responded to LabVIEW’s limitations by reaching for Python → and rightfully so.
Python offers:
But Python isn’t a drop-in replacement for LabVIEW. It struggles with:
The smart path forward is integration.
By combining LabVIEW’s strengths in hardware control and UI with Python’s scriptability and ecosystem, teams can build systems that are:
Let's say you're in power electronics and have a LabVIEW test stand managing six stations and a custom user interface. If you wanted to add a new sequence editor and integrate it with a web API for reporting you could keep the LabVIEW core and UI, but:
The result?
- No "rip and replace"
- A modernized platform
- Happy engineers
If you’re maintaining a LabVIEW-based system (or considering building one) you’re not behind the times. You’re working with a powerful, time-tested platform that’s uniquely suited to test automation.
Want to explore how LabVIEW fits into a more modern tech stack? Check out Modern LabVIEW Engineering for tips on integrating Python, APIs, and modular frameworks (without starting over).
I'm Jason Benfer, your LabVIEW Coach.

Let me know if you'd like me to explore a topic in particular. Just email jason@...
LabVIEW software remains a cornerstone of industrial test systems.
If you’re wondering whether to build new in LabVIEW, refactor what you have, or integrate with Python → reach out.
I’ve helped dozens of teams modernize without rewriting everything.